The Difference between Armed and Unarmed Security Guards

Security guards actively maintain safety and security in diverse environments such as businesses, residential areas, and public events. When hiring security guards, a crucial factor to ponder is whether to opt for armed or unarmed personnel. Both types offer distinct pros and cons, necessitating a comprehensive comprehension of their disparities. In this article we will explain the difference between armed and unarmed security guards.

Armed Security Guards

Security professionals who carry firearms while on duty are known as armed security guards. They must undergo rigorous training and possess the required licenses and permits to carry firearms. Typically, armed security guards are recruited in high-risk environments like banks, jewelry stores, and businesses dealing with substantial cash or valuable assets.

Pros of Armed Security Guards

1. Prevent Criminal Activities: Armed security guards effectively discourage criminal activities by their mere firearm presence. Their training equips them to address potential security breaches promptly and respond swiftly during emergencies.

2. Rapid Response Time: During an emergency, armed security guards possess the ability to rapidly and effectively respond. Their training equips them to handle tense scenarios, render first aid, evacuate the area, and, if needed, reach out to law enforcement.

3. Heightened Security: Businesses that handle substantial amounts of cash or valuable assets benefit from the heightened protection offered by armed security guards. These guards undergo training to safeguard these assets against potential threats, such as robbery or theft.

Cons of Armed Security Guards

1. Higher Costs: Hiring armed security guards incurs higher costs compared to hiring unarmed security guards. This is because it necessitates additional training and involves expenses related to firearms and ammunition. 
2. Heightened Responsibility: The authorization for armed security guards to carry firearms enhances their liability in case of a security breach. They must legally justify any use of force, as any errors can result in significant legal and financial repercussions.

---

Unarmed Security Guards

Security professionals who do not carry firearms while on duty are known as unarmed security guards. They are commonly employed in low-risk environments like schools, hospitals, and shopping centers. Unarmed security guards receive training to effectively address potential security breaches and swiftly respond during emergencies.

Pros of Unarmed Security Guards

1. Cost Effective: Hiring unarmed security guards proves to be a more cost-effective option compared to hiring armed security guards. This is because they do not necessitate additional training or incur expenses related to firearms and ammunition.
2. Lowered Responsibility: Unarmed security guards lack authorization to carry firearms, thereby decreasing their liability if a security breach occurs. Typically, the use of force by an unarmed security guard is restricted to physical restraint and excludes the involvement of firearms.
3. Professional Demeanor: In low-risk environments, the employment of unarmed security guards is customary, as their professional demeanor holds great significance. They receive training to manage potential security breaches in a composed and professional manner, aiding in the de-escalation of potentially volatile situations.

Cons of Unarmed Security Guards

1. Minimal Protection: In high-risk settings like banks and jewelry stores, unarmed security guards offer minimal protection. Their inability to carry firearms restricts their capacity to address potential security breaches effectively.

2. Reduced Deterrence: The absence of firearms among unarmed security guards diminishes their capacity to deter potential criminals. Although trained to observe and report suspicious activity, they lack the same level of deterrence as armed security guards.